Sample Report Walkthrough (Synthetic Example)

Who this is for: Written for providers and attorneys who want to see the structure of a Braintree report before they refer.

Why we show a sample

Providers and attorneys often want to know what they will receive before they refer. This walkthrough explains each section of a typical Braintree report using synthetic example content, so you can see how findings are presented and how a treating provider might use them. It is illustrative only; every real report reflects the individual patient.

The neurologist's interpretation is the heart of the report.

Sections 1 and 2: Referral, history and symptoms

The report opens with identifying details (synthetic in the sample), the referring provider, the date of testing and the reason for referral. Results describe function on that specific date, so this matters. Next comes a summary of the injury as described in the referral, including date and mechanism, relevant history such as prior concussions or migraines, current medications and the patient's symptom ratings. This is the context the neurologist uses to interpret results.

Sections 3 and 4: Tests performed and results

The report lists the assessments completed, such as eye-movement testing, neurocognitive tasks, symptom questionnaires and brain-activity recording as one adjunct measure, and notes test-day conditions that could affect results, like poor sleep or a headache. Equipment is described by function, never by brand. Results are generally compared with reference data, so a reader can see which measures fall within expected ranges and which do not. The sample shows how this might look for a patient with mixed results.

Related in this series: Physician-Reviewed Diagnostic Reports, Head Injury Documentation Attorneys Review Before a Demand and Referral Guide for Providers (PDF + Page). For the full overview, start with our guide, TBI Diagnostics: What Tests and Reports Show.

Section 5: Neurologist interpretation

This is the heart of the report. The neurologist summarizes what the findings, taken together and in context, may mean clinically, noting consistency across tests, limitations and how findings relate to reported symptoms.

If something looks inconsistent with your clinical picture, tell us. Your perspective as the treating provider matters.

Section 6: Considerations for the treating provider

The report may note considerations such as specialty evaluations or follow-up testing. They are suggestions only. The treating provider decides care.

What you won't find

No legal conclusions, no statements on causation, damages or admissibility, and no marketing language.

How to read it as a provider

Start with the neurologist's interpretation, then look at the results that support it, and check that the history section matches what you know about the patient. If something looks inconsistent with your clinical picture, contact our team; clinical questions are routed to the reviewing physician. Partners can request the complete synthetic sample during a briefing. Call 813-709-3771.